Saturday, March 04, 2006

Indian Curry delights England

What a beginning to the England tour of India! They lose their very astute captain Vaughan, and their vice captain Trescothick – both leading batsmen, well respected the world over for their devastating skill with the willow – even before the first ball is bowled in this series. And let’s not forget Simon Jones, England’s sultan of swing. So, what are we left with – a hastily cobbled up team including 3 debutantes, who have absolutely no wind of how the breeze blows in India. The only saving grace is that Flintoff – the man who loves his cricket as much as his country – is still well and is handed over the baton in the absence of Vaughan. And he still has a few good, though injured, warriors in the form of Pieterson & Collingwood. But can England beat India in India? Even if they had a full bench? And now, with a completely depleted team? What a hypothetical question, I tell you! Can the Sun rise from the West? Can the Earth stop to spin? I guess you got the answer.

So, when the two teams began the series to battle it out for the 2nd rating in the test teams rating, it was pretty much a foregone conclusion that the Indians would cream the English, and then even juice out the pulp. Any tea-stall runner would have told you this. I am sure the betting sites were doing zero business – who would bet on England? But that would have been till yesterday. Cricket, as they say, is a game of glorious uncertainties. I believe that’s a phrase that Indian commentators use mostly to cover up for their team’s goof-ups. But then, I could be wrong; and you too have a right to difference of opinion. However, facts speak for themselves.

Any spinner born the west side of the Nile can never even dream to make a dream debut against the Asians, and more specially the Indians. I am sure that a particular Sikh gentleman by the name of Monty Panesar only hoped to make a touristy visit to the land of his ancestors, when he was picked for this tour of India. To be given the ball in the very first match against a full-strength Indian side in their full stride would only mean that England was hoping to quickly make sure that this Indian-origin person would quickly go back to playing county cricket only. Right? Wrong!

If I ever played cricked for another country as a bowler, my biggest dream would be to bowl to Sachin Tendulkar and get his wicket. And to get that as my first International wicket – well, Guru Nanak Devji had to be really prasann with his putra to give him the divinity to do so. Sri Vahe Guruji da Khalsa; Sri Vahe Guruji di Fateh. Well, Monty bowled Full, and that’s exactly what happened – the Full Monty of Indian cricket is there to see for all. Should I say, Raj Karega Khalsa?

Who would have thought that this spinner would trouble the Indians the most, and take 2 prized wickets! I am not taking anything away from Hoggard here. To bowl on a dustbowl and get 6 wickets – that’s a feat that any pacer would be immensely proud of. And England have India on the mat thoroughly with a lead of 70 runs in the first inning. My God! Wasn’t it supposed to be the other way round? Where did we go wrong? Or is it more appropriate to ask, where did England go right?

All I can think of is that probably we got too complacent after Pakistan, and over-confident by the fact that England seemed like babes in the woods. But this Indian team has learnt its lessons fast and done course corrections faster. Hope that they would live up to the reputation & faith they’ve built over these past few months. Otherwise, Mr. Chappell will have to do some more work on this team, rather than lazily write columns in foreign newspapers about the worthiness of certain players, who he believes are bad news for this emerging Indian side. Or alternatively, he may just add a few more names to that column. Did I hear someone say Endulkar?

No comments:

Copyright Regulations for Content on this Blog

This blog is syndicated & copyrighted. The entire text appearing on this blog is copyrighted to its original author, Shailesh Nigam. Why has this been done? Well, for the simple reason that the thoughts expressed herein are original creations, and as such the author has an exclusive right to intellectual property over them. And while I surely welcome people to use/quote some or all of the articles here, I would definitely like to be acknowledged for such usage as the original source.

You are free to share, distribute or transmit any single article or multiple/all articles (fully or a part thereof) on this blog electronically, by printing, by handwriting, orally, photographically, audio-visually, or through any other medium not mentioned herein, only under the following conditions:

* Attribution. You must attribute the content that you’ve used by prominently displaying a credit link back to the specific article page. The credit link used should point to the article page and not just to shaileshnigam.blogspot.com’s homepage.

* Content Usage Limit. You are allowed to republish an ENTIRE article or blog post on your website or print publication or e-document, only under the condition that I, Shailesh Nigam, am given credit as sole author of such an article, and the url for the blogpost pointing to the specific article page is published with the article, citing it as the source. An attribution link to this blog must be included even if you use an excerpt.

* Non-commercial Usage. You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless given pre-authorization in writing by me only. Content on shaileshnigam.blogspot.com cannot be used as is or by repackaging, rewriting, remodeling and sold to anyone for cash/kind; nor can it be used in its entirety as a free gift or bonus or charity that can be used for commercial gains or for the sake of gaining publicity. If you want to syndicate or distribute any full article on your website, please email me for permission. Explicit written permission must be granted before you can do so.

© 2005-2017 Shailesh Nigam